Green Scissors 2001
AboutIssuesNews RoomPublicationsTake Action


Issues > Public Lands> Printer Version
Freeze the Slush

U.S. Forest Service Salvage Fund
$79.9 million

"Allowing the agency to retain a portion of the revenue it generates from timber sales without deducting its costs may encourage the Forest Service to not always recover its cost to prepare and administer sales."


General Accounting Office,
Forest Service Salvage Fund's Deposits and Outlays, August 1996.

The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Salvage Fund was created to expedite the removal of insect-infested, dead, damaged or down timber. Salvage sale revenues are deposited in the Salvage Fund. The USFS is authorized to make expenditures from the Salvage Fund without an annual appropriations request, giving Congress little ability to monitor and control this spending. Presently, the Salvage Fund is financing approximately one third of the logging on the National Forests completely free from congressional oversight. Many of these sales fail to cover significant portions of their costs.

Green Scissors Proposal
Abolish the U.S. Forest Service Salvage Fund and return the unspent balance to the U.S. Treasury. The current amount programmed for the fund to use in fiscal year 2003 is approximately $79.9 million.

Program Hurts Taxpayers

The USFS has exploited salvage sales to create a large fund that is unaccountable to Congress and provides no revenue to taxpayers. According to the Congressional Research Service, "[n]o Forest Service budget documents have identified transfers of excess collections from the Salvage Fund to the U.S. Treasury," as required by existing law. In fact, the USFS has been sitting on large amounts of money, as the Salvage Fund balance was more than $182 million in fiscal year 1997, $171 million in fiscal year 1998, $142 million in fiscal year 1999 and about $118 million in 2000. The amount the Fund is planning to use in fiscal year 2003 is $79.9 million. The Fund promotes a timber treadmill whereby managers are encouraged to promote salvage sales, since forest managers keep the sales receipts instead of returning the funds to the Treasury. In addition, shortfalls from one forest are often made up by excess receipts from another forest. Taxpayers end up funding excessive timber management so that the USFS can perpetuate its bureaucracy.

The Salvage Fund, which is fed from timber receipts, provides local managers with an incentive to enhance sales by adding higher value green trees with the lower value salvage material. Industry benefits by paying less than market value for wood while having a portion of the sales financed by taxpayers.

Program Hurts the Environment

Increased scrutiny of the USFS Salvage program has uncovered numerous instances of inappropriate sales of live, healthy trees under the guise of salvaging dead and dying trees. Most salvage sales do not consider the impact of logging live and healthy trees as part of the costs of the sale.

Salvage logging generates cash available for other timber sales, which gives local forest managers an incentive to choose logging over other management activities. For instance, instead of using prescribed burns to reduce the risk of insect outbreak, a forest manager may choose salvage logging and the resulting timber receipts. Logging often has greater impacts on wildlife, habitat, water quality, forest function, and scenic beauty than other management activities. In the end, the land, taxpayers and Congress are not well served by this slush fund.

Contacts

  • Carolyn Alkire, The Wilderness Society, (202) 429-2685;
  • Steve Holmer, American Lands Alliance, (202) 547-9105;
  • Cena Swisher, Taxpayers for Common Sense, (202) 546-8500 x132;
  • Sean Cosgrove, Sierra Club, (202) 675-2382.

Home | About | Issues | News Room | Publications | Take Action