|
The Return of a Radioactive Idea: Nuclear Reprocessing
Some
of the worst pork in the federal government hides under the shadow of
obscurity. So it is with the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative, a
Department of Energy program that’s gotten more than $260 million over
the last five years. What is the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative? Ask a
dozen members of Congress, and you’ll probably get little more than a
dozen shrugs.
It turns out that the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative is the first step
in the Department of Energy’s quiet campaign to reestablish a nuclear
reprocessing program in the United States. The nuclear reprocessing
idea, which was revived in the 2001 energy task force, has been a
leading goal of the Department of Energy’s top brass over the past few
years.
The only problem is that nuclear reprocessing is a fiscal and environmental mess.
This
costly and complex procedure to separate uranium and plutonium from
spent nuclear fuel is
a relic of the Cold War. Today, it is mistakenly being touted as
a way to deal with the nation’s nuclear waste problem – even though the
Nuclear Energy Institute openly admits that the technology doesn’t cut
down on the permanent waste storage capacity needed.
The program also raises serious proliferation concerns, which led both
Presidents Ford and Carter to implement a policy against reprocessing.
About 250 metric tons of plutonium from commercial
reprocessing—equivalent to more than 30,000 nuclear bombs—has been
separated globally, leaving it vulnerable to theft.
The U.S. has only had one commercial nuclear reprocessing facility in
its history – the West Valley plant in New York, which operated in the
late 1960’s and early 1970’s and was a complete disaster. After a
series of problems, the plant closed in 1973 and left taxpayers with an
estimated $8.3 billion clean-up job, which is still incomplete. More
recently, other countries have gotten into the reprocessing act, with
similar results. For example Japan is nearly finished constructing a
reprocessing plant that cost a whopping $20 billion, more than three
times what was originally expected.
Although the industry hasn’t pulled out its reprocessing pompoms just
yet, they have never been one to shy away from a handout. And thus far,
the government has obliged: the DOE’s reprocessing R&D program, the
Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative, just got $580 million in authorizations
over three years in the new energy bill that was signed in August.

How has this bad idea traveled so far? Only by flying under the radar.
Without any public hearing, language was inserted into the House Energy
& Water Development appropriations bill that would require the DOE
to develop a reprocessing plan by 2007. This is no way to deal with
such a huge and costly endeavor: in 1999, DOE estimated that a
variation of this program could cost the U.S. as much as $280 billion
to implement.
Although DOE
has since retracted that estimate, they have refused to provide a new
one.
Reprocessing is a radioactive idea, and it will only work with huge
handouts from Uncle Sam. It’s about time someone shine a light on this
boondoggle, because once construction of a reprocessing plant gets
underway, we can kiss billions of our tax dollars goodbye.

|