|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issues >
Energy
>
Printer
Version $90
million Green Scissors
Proposal Current
Status Project Hurts Taxpayers WIPP is far over budget. When it opened, WIPP was already $2 billion over budget, and the DOE had raised the facility's total lifetime budget to $19 billion. A 1996 General Accounting Office report suggested that the budget could grow to $29 billion. The DOE has set unrealistic goals for the amount of waste to be shipped to WIPP. Failure to meet these shipment goals will result in further overspending, as the facility will have to operate for years longer than anticipated to reach its capacity of 6.2 million cubic feet of waste. Contrary to the DOE's original claims, filling WIPP at the present rate will take more than 300 years. DOE is wasting money trying
to expand WIPP's mission. After
spending millions of dollars on a proposal to expand WIPP's surface
storage capacity, the DOE withdrew the request in September 2000
in the face of strong public opposition and the State of New
Mexico's intent to deny the request. The site is not stable. Salt movement in the underground caverns where the waste is stored has occurred three times faster than expected, causing rooms to collapse and possibly jeopardizing workers' lives. As a result, the DOE will have to abandon about 10 percent of WIPP's capacity because the underground rooms are unsafe. Preventing accidental exposure to radioactive waste is impossible. It will release radiation and hazardous chemicals into the environment. The DOE's proposals to store large amounts of waste indefinitely on the surface at WIPP will result in substantial releases during the next few years. Moreover, human intrusion at the site is likely, due to large quantities of oil, natural gas, and potash at the site. It will dispose of only
a fraction of the two TRU wastes. Less than one-third of the existing TRU waste
inventory by volume and less than .01 percent of the radioactivity
in existing nuclear wastes will be disposed of. The DOE has no
plans to safely dispose of the majority of the existing TRU waste
inventory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|